Celtic's Maeda Denied Second Goal Against Hibs: Match Highlights

Admin

3 min read

Post on Feb 24, 2025

4.1

Share

Celtic's Maeda Denied Second Goal Against Hibs: Match Highlights

GLASGOW, SCOTLAND – Kyogo Furuhashi's brace and a late strike from substitute David Turnbull secured a comfortable 3-1 victory for Celtic over Hibernian at Easter Road on Saturday, but the match was notable for a controversial incident involving Daizen Maeda. The Japanese forward, who had already scored a goal, appeared to have added a second, only for the referee to rule it out. While the final scoreline showcased Celtic's dominance, the Maeda incident sparked debate among fans and pundits alike.

The match started brightly for the Hoops. Celtic controlled possession from the outset, pressing high and forcing Hibs into numerous errors. Furuhashi opened the scoring in the [Insert Time] minute with a [Describe the goal – e.g., powerful header from a Greg Taylor cross, neat finish after a driving run, etc.], showcasing his clinical finishing ability. Hibs fought back gamely, creating several chances, but their efforts were thwarted by a combination of resolute defending from Celtic and some excellent goalkeeping from Joe Hart.

Maeda, a key figure in Celtic's attack, was a constant threat throughout the game. His tireless running and intelligent movement caused Hibs' defense constant problems. He scored his goal in the [Insert Time] minute, [Describe the goal – e.g., with a deft touch after a clever through ball from Callum McGregor, a tap-in from close range, etc.]. It was a goal that perfectly encapsulated his style of play – a combination of speed, agility, and opportunistic finishing.

However, the controversy arose later in the game. In the [Insert Time] minute, Maeda appeared to have doubled his tally, [Describe the disallowed goal and the reason for its disallowance – e.g., following a swift counter-attack, but the referee deemed him to have been offside by a very tight margin; after a scramble in the box, but the linesman flagged for a foul in the build-up, etc.]. Replays were inconclusive, leading to heated discussions amongst fans and even some questioning the consistency of the officiating. The decision to disallow the goal was a pivotal moment in the game, leaving many wondering what might have been if the goal had stood.

Despite the disallowed goal, Celtic's dominance persisted. Hibs managed to pull one back through [Insert Hibs goalscorer and details of the goal – e.g., a stunning long-range effort from Josh Campbell, a deflected free-kick by Martin Boyle, etc.], giving their fans a glimmer of hope. However, any chances of a comeback were extinguished when Turnbull scored a late goal in the [Insert Time] minute, sealing the victory for Celtic. His goal [Describe the goal – e.g., was a beautiful curling effort from outside the box, came after a swift break, etc.] exemplified Celtic's relentless attacking prowess.

The final whistle blew with Celtic securing a comfortable win, solidifying their position at the top of the Scottish Premiership table. While the victory was deserved, the debate surrounding Maeda's disallowed goal will undoubtedly linger in the minds of fans for some time to come, highlighting the contentious nature of close offside decisions in modern football. The match was a showcase of Celtic’s attacking fluidity and defensive resilience, even with the refereeing controversy adding another layer to the narrative. The Hoops will look to maintain this form as the season progresses.